Pizzagate was never debunked

My heart sinks when I see that six years later, the cover up succeeded, the public is none the wiser, and much of the original research has been scrubbed from the Internet completely.

My heart sinks whenever I see a blue checkmark on Twitter — meaning, a journalist or pundit sporting a “verification” mark over there — take the low hanging fruit of winning over more liberal readers by dunking on Pizzagate… or more accurately, dunking on the caricature of what these people claim Pizzagate is or was.

First, was the cover up. I was deplatformed, threatened, gang stalked. Isaac Kappy was driven to suicide. Ben Swann fell into a worm hole, seemingly, and disappeared for a year shortly after his local CBS segment on Pizzagate aired.

To review: Pizzagate was NEVER the claim that Hillary Clinton slaughters children in pizza shops, nor did it involve speculation over whether she slaughters kids using a network of pizza shop basements. It was never that claim, so it’s sad to see otherwise sensible journalists using that hook to dunk on truthers.

“Oh these are the people who believe in Pizzagate.”

Nah, not so fast insectoid subhuman blue checkmark masquerading as an actual responsible adult and neutral sifter of information.

Pizzagate was always, from day one — I helped come up with the name Pizzagate — the peculiar “pizza,” “walnut sauce,” and “pasta” emails released by WikiLeaks just weeks before the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

Troubling to many researchers, the emails made no sense at all, unless it was code of some kind. Also troubling at the time, some of the code words appeared to overlap well with words already known to law enforcement as used by child traffickers and sex groomers, including referring to children of various kinds as “pizza.”

In relation to the leaked emails: How do you rent pizza, for an hour? Why do millionaire lobbyists celebrate “sharing” a single slice of pizza? How do you go walnut saucing? When asking about the pizza, how is “still in torture chamber” an appropriate reply? Why is one of the wealthiest women in the nonprofit world loaning or renting her 6 year old grandchildren out to 70 year old DNC-linked lobbyists, to play with them in the middle of the Virginia woods, in what is described as a “heated pool” and “for entertainment.”

That was Pizzagate in a nutshell.

The establishment had no answer for that stuff, and to this day there is no answer — which is why they had to rebrand Pizzagate as something involving Hillary Clinton, and something absurd.

Hillary Clinton’s only connection to Pizzagate is that a pizza shop in which fundraisers were held on her behalf pops up in the WikiLeaks — Hillary sent that pizza shop’s owner a personalized thank you note, which he subsequently posted on his Instagram account, and he also appears in the social circle of people emailing back and forth in the WikiLeaks emails.

But beyond that, Hillary Clinton and any specific pizza shop proprietors were NEVER the focus of Pizzagate.

So score those easy brownie points with narrative lock stepped normative leftists while you can, lazy “journalists” — because one day soon they’ll all resent you. Even leftists don’t like goddamn liars.

And the puerile, unidimensional, not particularly funny coverup of Pizzagate is losing its luster.

It was NEVER about Hillary Clinton, nor pizza shops, nor whether pizza shops have a basement in which to hide supposed nefarious activity.

Never, never, never.

From the very day the first 2016 livestreams referred to those emails as Pizzagate, it has been about the inexplicably bizarre coded emails over on WikiLeaks, the fact that these were and are very highly placed people within the US government and corporate media and Hollywood, and the fact that their excitement for these words just doesn’t make much sense at all — unless it is code for something else altogether.

If you want to understand what those emails may have been about… Start here:

5 years later, I'm not convinced we got this one wrong.

That’s the 8 minute viral video that garnered a million views on YouTube, before being unilaterally scrubbed and banned from the Internet at the time.

And then, if you want to dive deeper, read this one:

Pizzagate's Aftermath

I don’t think I got “Pizzagate” wrong.

From day one, I think these emails required investigation, rather than public mockery.

I still think that: they require investigation.

Not the people talking about it.

But the emails. And the people sending and receiving those emails.

And even if I got it wrong, the deplatforming of me and attempted destruction of my career is a pathetic mark on the failing culture — a culture that celebrates and protects the rights of complete degenerates, while silencing the rest of us without a moment’s thought.

This stuff must go high up, because Trump never wanted to touch it, and one of his aides was just charged with a bunch of child abuse stuff; the aide noted babies were his “absolute favorite” according to court documents — these folks never wanted to dig into Pizzagate, because it hits a little too close to home for some of them. This trash is a bipartisan problem.

This stuff must also go high up, because the system rewarded the very DC judge who went along with the “Pizzagate shooter” cover up of this wide-ranging scandal… rewarded her with a lifelong Supreme Court seat!

Job well done, sentencing that very dangerous Pizzagate shooter who harmed no one, but who succeeded in silencing the narrative — as the media framed further discussion of the scandal as irresponsible, and near incitement of violence.

One day, the public will connect all the dots, and they’ll be angry at those in media who intentionally wallpapered over this one with thin humor, and callous disregard for the unanswered questions.